මින් ඉදිරියට දේශපාලඥයින්ගේ විදුලි බිඳවැටුම් නඩත්තුවක් නෑ…

?????? ??????????????? ???? ?????????…

??? ?????????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???????? ?????????? ????? ???? ??????…

?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?????…

?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????????, ????????? ?????? ??? ????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ??? ??????? ?????…

????? ????????, ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????????? ??????????? ??? ??? ??? ???????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ???????????? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ???????…

???? ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????…

????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ?????.

ලංවිම ඉංජිනේරු සංගමයේ ප්‍රවෘත්ති නිවේදනය

???????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ??? ???? ?? ???????? ???????? ????? ???????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?????.

???????? ????????? ???? ?? ???????, ???????? ???????? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ????????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ??????????? ??? ??? ??? ????????? ????????? ? ?? ?? ??????.

??? ??????? ???????? ?????? ???? ??, ????, ??????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???? ?????????.

?????????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???? ????????? ???????.

???? ???????? ????????????? ???? ?? ??? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ?????.

??????????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???? ???????. ??????? ????? ???????????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ??? ??????????, ????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ???????.

??????? ????? ?? ?????????, ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ???, ????? ???????? ???? ??????????????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ????? ??? ?????????? ?? ???????? ??????? ?? ??????.

ඔබේ වහලයටත් සූර්ය බල පද්ධතියක් සවි කරගන්න කලින් දැනුවත් වෙන්න…!!!

“??? ?????? ????? ?? ????????? ??? ????????? ?? ?????? ???????? ???????? ????????” ?? ???? ?????? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ?????????, ??????? ??? ? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?”. ?? ???? ?????? ?????????? ??? ??????? ????????? ?? ???????? ?????. ?????? ????? ????? ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ??????. ??? ??????? ? ????????? ??????? ??? ????, ????????? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???, ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ???????.????? ?? ????????? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ???????? ????. ? ??? ??? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ????? , ? ???? ???? ?????????? ??? ??? ????????? ????? ???? ??????? ????? ?? ?????.

1. ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ???? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ( On Grid Solar System ) – ?? ??????? ????? ?? ????????? ??? ????????, ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ????. ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ????, ??? ?????? ????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ???? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? ???????? ??. ???? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ??????? ??. ????? ????? ???? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ??????? ???????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??. ???? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ???????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ????? ??????. Rooftop Solar System – ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ??????, ????? ?????? ???????? ??? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ** ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ???, ??? ?? ????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ????. ???? ???????? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ???????? ???? ??????? ??????? ???? ??? ????, ?? ???? ??????????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ??? ?????. ?? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??????. ??????? ??????????????? ??????????? 80% ? ?????????? ??? ????? ???? ????????? ????????? ?????. ** ?????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ????? ???????? ???????? ??????, ?? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ????????????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????. ???? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ????? ???, ????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ????????????? ???????? ??, ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???.??????? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ?? ???????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????, ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ???????. ?????? ?????? ????????????? ??? ?? ?? ??????? ????? ???????. ? ??????? ??? ?????????, ??????? ??????? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ???? ????????.

2. ????? ???????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? ( Off Grid Solar System ) – ????? ?????? ?? ???????? ???????????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ????. ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ???????? ???? ????? ??? ??????, ??????? ??????? ?? ??? ????????? ???, ?????? ?????? ?????????? ? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ????. ???? ????????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?? ???, ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ???????? ( Peak hours- ??????? 6.00 ?? 10.00 ?? ??? ) ????? ?????????? ???? ?? ???? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ??? ??????. ?? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??????????. ??? ???? ????? ???????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ???? ????????? ????? ???? ????? ?????????, ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ???????? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ??? ?????. ????????? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ???. ?????? ??????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?????.

3. ????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? ?????? ( Hybrid Solar System )??? ????? ???????? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? (On-grid Solar System ) ??? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ??. ?????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ????? ???????? ???? ?? ??????, ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??.

Eng. Lakmali Karunanayake (Chief Engineer – EM – NWP1)

ක්‍රමයේ වෙනසක් (System Change)

????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ??????? ??????….

විදුලි අවුල තවත් වසර හතරක්. 2026 දක්වාම යයි…!!!

????????? ???????? ?????? ??????? 2026 ??? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ????. 2014 ?? ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ??? ??????? ???????? ?? ??? ? ???? ????? ????.

2030 ?? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ????????? 70%?? ?????????? ??????? ????????????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????. ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? 3????? ?????? ?????. ?????? ????? ???????? 90?, 50? ?? 150? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ????????? ????. ????? 2020 ??????? ????? ???????? 150? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?? ???????? 40? ???? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ??????? ??????? ???????? ????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ??? ?? ?? ???? ??? ???????? ???? ?????.

?????????? ??????????? ????? ??? ??????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ??. ??? ????????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ??????? ??? ? ???? ???? ???????????? ?????? ???? ??? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ??????? ????? ???? ???, ???? ????? ??????? ????????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ????? ????.

news – අකුරට වැඩ නිසා පැය 8 න් පසු හදිසි විදුලිය බිඳ වැටීම් සේවාවලින් ඉවත් වේ – ලංකා විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලයේ විදුලි ඉංජිනේරු සංගමය

????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????????????? ???? ??? 8 ? ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ??????? ??? ?????? ????????? ? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????.

??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ??(01) ????? ?????? ?????? ?????????.

?? ???, ??????? ???????? ??? ??? ????? 40? ????? ???????? ???? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ???????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ????????????????????? ?? ???? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ??? ??? ???????? ?????? ??? ???????.

?? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ?????????? ????????? ??? ??????? ????????? ?? ?????.

? ??????????????????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ????????? ?????.  

???????? ????? ??? ??????? ????????????? ??????? ? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ???? ??????? ?? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???. https://www.youtube.com/embed/djNAN3_uwVw

MAWBIMA ”පැය 8න් පසු විදුලිය බිඳ වැටුණොත් සේවය සපයන්නේ නැහැ” – ලංවිම ඉන්ජිනේරුවරු

???? ???????? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ????????????? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? 8? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ????.

?? (????. 1) ????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ????? ???, ??? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ? ????? ??? ?????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?? ?.

???? ?????, ????????? ?.?.4.15?? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??????? ??? ?.

??? ?????????????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ??????????? ???????? ?????? ??? ????? ???, ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ??? ?????? ???????????????????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????? ?? ?.

?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???????????? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ??????.

???? ???????? ??????? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ???? ?? ???????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??? ?? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?.

??? ???????? ???? ?????, “?????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??” ???? ??? ????? ??? ?.

??? ??????? ???, ??? ?? ??? “?????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ??” ?.

???? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????????????? ??? ??????? ??????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ? ??? ??????.

????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ??????? ?? ? ?? ???????? ?????? ???? ??????? ????????????? ???????? ??? ???????? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ? ??? ????? ??? ?.

????? ?, ??????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ????? ? ??? ???????? ?? ??????? ??? ?.

https://mawbima.lk/news-more/89854

Sunday TIMES – CEB plans to divide to 8 units amidst protests

The Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) is now in for systematic restructuring process by unbundling it into eight separate corporate entities for power generation, transmission, and distribution, a recent board paper on the administration specified. Workers are protesting the move.

The board paper indicated that it plans to reduce massive losses of the CEB by transforming it into efficient profit making institution by setting up these entities under eight new general managers.

These entities will undertake functions of the CEB relating to hydro electricity, thermal electricity, coal power and non renewable power generation, distribution, and other activities of CEB as well as Lanka Electricity Company (LECO). A new Electricity Reforms Bill will be drafted and presented in Parliament soon to regularise the restructuring process, a senior official of the Ministry of Power said.

According to the board paper the CEB has been incurring losses due to the purchase of electricity at higher prices and selling it to consumers at lower prices, he added.

The total loss of the board due to non-collection of electricity bills during the last few months as a result of the country’s lockdown was Rs. 90 billion.

He also stated that the CEB had not received Rs. 28.40 billion due to non-payment of bills last September.

A sum of Rs. 70 billion a month was collected from electricity consumers in bill payments and due to the relief given to consumers to pay their bills during the last epidemic period, while the CEB has to recover Rs. 17 billion from hotels and industrialists alone, he pointed out

President of the Engineers’ Association Saumya Kumarawadu told the Business Times that their union in collaboration with other trade unions would take strong action against the appointment of eight general managers.

The board has failed to increase the generation capacity in the recent past to meet the growing demand by implementing any mega power plants including large scale renewable energy projects in the recent past even after the President’s green energy was announced, he pointed out.

The CEB has a staff of 23,000 inclusive of over 1,400 professionals and unions are continuing their agitation against the government’s initiatives of entering into power deals including the controversial Yugadanavi LNG power project and attempts to privatise the institution under the cover of restructuring, he added.

The unbundling will also provide an opportunity for the government to get rid of the majority of staff giving them a golden handshake, the trade union leader alleged.

https://www.sundaytimes.lk/211128/business-times/ceb-plans-to-divide-to-8-units-amidst-protests-463067.html

Ada Derana – CEB engineers begin work-to-rule campaign

The Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) says that its members have launched a work-to-rule campaign from 12 noon today (25) over several issues including the controversial Yugadanavi power plant deal.

The association demands that the government not proceed with the deal with US-based energy company New Fortress Energy Inc., which includes a transfer of 40% of shares of West Coast Power Private Limited (WCPL) – the owner of Yugadanavi power plant in Kerawalapitiya.

They also call on authorities to put an immediately stop to the abrupt transfers of senior management of the CEB.

The CEBEU says that under the work-to-rule campaign its members will only work during the normal office hours on working days, except those who are on shift duties. 

The association also warns that they would resort to strike action if the relevant authorities fail to respond to their demands. 

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=78683

DIVAINA- විදුලි සටන තීන්දුයි: යුගදනවි පැවරීමේ ගිවිසුම අහෝසි කරන්න – ලංවිම ඉංජිනේරුවො අකුරට වැඩ

??????? ???????? ????? 40 ? ????? ?? ???. ???. ??. ?????????? ????????? ???? ????????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????? ??? (25??) ??? ????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??????????????? ??????? ???.

???????? ??? ??????? ??????????????? ???????? ???????? ??? ???????? ????? ??? ???????? ??? ???????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????.

????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????????????? ??? ????? 12.00 ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ???. ?????????? ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ???.

?????? ???????? ????? ?? ??????? ??????????????? ???? ??? ???????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???????? ??? 10 ?? ??????. ?? ??????? ????????????? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ???.

???. ???. ??. ??????? ???????? ?? ???????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ????? ???????. ?????? ??????? ???. ???. ??. ??????? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ????????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ?????. ?? ????? ???????????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?? ????. ?????? ???????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ???????? ?? ??????.

????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ???????. ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????????? ???????? ?? ????. ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????.

?????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ??? ???????? ??????? ???????? ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????. ???. ???. ??. ????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ???? ??????. ? ???? ??? ???????? ??? ?????? ?? ????. ????????? ???. ???. ??. ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??????.

?????? ?????? – ???????? ????? ???????

New Fortress ගනුදෙනුව පිළිබද පුවත්

The hottest potato now on the lap of the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) is an unsolicited proposal from a giant U.S. corporation, New Fortress Energy (NFE), to build a new offshore LNG (liquefied natural gas) receiving, storage and regasification terminal in Colombo. A framework agreement to go ahead with this proposal has already been allegedly signed but very little of this was known to the wider public. Unsurprisingly, allegations that this was done in secret is being widely bandied about. Lesser constituents of the government are unhappy about this proposal and Finance Minister Basil Rajapaksa who is pushing it on the grounds that it will enable cheaper long-term electricity generation benefiting hard-pressed consumers had a discussion with party leaders of the ruling coalition on this subject last Thursday. What finally emerged there has not been revealed but it is clear that the government is determined to push ahead with the proposal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuNmrtd244s

LNG Scam is a Hangman’s Noose – Prof. Kumar David

THE ISLAND – There has been a news blackout on the liquid natural gas (LNG) deal that Basil Rajapaksa’s Ministry has entered into with the American company New Fortress Energy (NFE). The Sunday Island Editorial last week 26 September expressed concern about lack of transparency of facts and secrecy in negotiations. The deal is a response to an “unsolicited bid” is the official line but how much soliciting and wheeler-dealing went on no one will never know. The negotiations though commenced when Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa was Finance Minister. I am not picking on the deal because it’s an American company, not at all. I am expressing disquiet about negotiating conduct, technical issues and potential long-term implications.

Before pitching into the topic I will define that ugly acronym FSRu&P (Floating Storage and Regasification unit & Pipelines). Natural gas globally is the fossil fuel of choice to replace King Coal. There is much disputation about whether one or two final coal-fired power stations will be built in Lanka in the next 15 years, but natural gas will be the eventual successor. Once released from the bowels of the earth, gas can be piped across continents. When chilled to very low temperatures it liquefies, ready for confinement in strong containers that can be brought into your kitchen or transported thousands of miles in huge tankers.

When a tanker arrives the FSRu&P game starts. Tankers can dock at a harbour designed for the purpose if you have one; if not a floating terminal is launched about five miles out at sea where LNG is stored. It can when needed be regasified – as in your kitchen gas cooker – and sent ashore via undersea pipelines. That’s the FSRU&P storyline and one of these is coming on the west coast, north of Colombo. The gas can be used in power-stations, industries and homes.

The plan is to convert the currently coal-fired 310MW West Coast Power Station (WCPS), Yugadhanavi, to gas, and to make the proposed Sobadhanavi 350MW station also gas fired. The gas-fired capacity will then be 660MW, but this is only the start. The CEB and the CPC (Petroleum Corporation) have reached an advanced stage in preparation and issue of documents calling for international bids for an FRSU and Pipelines, but not yet for the supply of LNG. Then suddenly and out of the blue the process was scuttled – it was infected by a bacillus. The Finance Ministry signed a Framework Agreement to proceed with the unsolicited or privately canvassed bid from NFE. A so-called Framework Agreement was inked in September in secrecy.

There are three harmful aspects. The first is unnecessary secrecy and unseemly sabotage of ongoing tender procedures. The second is a likely financial rip-off that may raise electricity prices and the third is a trap that will endanger Lanka’s long-term energy security and put the country’s neck into a hangman’s noose.

First things first. It is a violation of good practice to make an award to an unsolicited bid when tenders have been called; it rings alarm bells whether someone took 10%. International Competitive Tenders were called by GoSL for an FSRu&P and bid documents were issued but the Finance Ministry inked a secret deal to sell 40% of WCPS to NFE in the midst of this. The deal was reported in New Fortress’s website but not in local media. When Sirasa TV asked Power & Energy Minister Dulles Alahapperuma, he denied any agreement. Something is fishy.

https://www.newfortressenergy.com/stories/New-Fortress-Energy-finalizes-contract-with-government-of-Sri-Lanka

Basil’s defenders and the CEB Engineers Union have locked horns. A Sinhala video by CEBEU President Saumya Kumaravadu provides an excellent summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjWQ9tvIz1k

An English statement is at:

The second shock is that in terms of the Framework Agreement the government has entered into a Take-or- Pay (ToP) deal for LNG. ToP is a bad idea if the amount contracted is large or if the donkeys writing the contracts have little understanding of electricity generation or the complexities of manoeuvring in global LNG markets. Under the tender care of these goofs Lanka will be played for a sucker – recall the oil hedging fiasco a few years ago. Suppose a petrol company offers you a fleet of taxis free (the BAIT), but on condition you buy your petrol exclusively from it for five years (the TRAP). Suppose the value of the fleet is Rs 25 million but the cost of the petrol to be consumed in the five year period is Rs 500 million. Whether you need it or not you must buy an agreed quantum from the petrol company. The BAIT in LNG story is that NFE will buy 40% of WCPS for $250 million (investment) and the TRAP is compulsory purchase of LNG for both power stations and any others subsequently taking gas from this facility.

Pricing could also be a problem. LNG prices are volatile and swings have become mercurial in the aftermath of recent supply chain disruptions. Spot-prices vary widely between Henry Hub, Japan-Korea and the Netherlands TTF spot-markets. Bangladesh bought a cargo for delivery last month at $29.9 per million-Btu, the highest the country has paid for super-chilled fuel. The average LNG price for November 2021 delivery to Northeast Asia is $27 per million-Btu. A wise man surely will keep purchasing manoeuvrability in his own hands.

Say the CEB incurs fuel supply expenditure of $500 million per annum – I am pricing natural gas at $14.5 per million-Btu; see Technical Note below for quantity estimate. If NFE makes, say 10% to 15% on the sale it will make a profit of $50 million to $75 million per year (example only). You might say “What’s the problem we have to buy LNG from somewhere?” But if in any year (lots of rainfall say) the CEB does not need that much, too bad; it will have to Take-or-Pay even if it does not use it, like alimony to an estranged wife. There will also be a fixed charge spread over the period by means of which NFE will recover its entire investment costs.

Finally the hangman’s noose. Sri Lanka has been trapped; it is infeasible to build a second FRSU and pipelines in a relatively small country since the investment is large. Once Lanka builds one, that’s it for a decade or more. We will neither need, nor be able to afford a second for a long time. India has only six terminals in operation. In the meantime the CEB long-term generation expansion plan envisages the addition of about 3GW (3000 MW) of gas-fired generation in the period from now to 2037. LNG will become the bedrock of electricity production in the period to 2040, displacing coal. The implication of the deal with NFE is that country will be in the pocket of a foreign company for energy security for the foreseeable future. The government is doing more to jeopardise natural security than any youthful, slogan-intoning, racist or religious hothead!

Renewable energy will and should be encouraged though it’s not going to provide 70% of primary energy for electricity by 2030 except in Aesop’s Fables. The cynic will read a dangerous trick written into a shady contract. Remember how in the 1990s corrupt presidents, politicos and businessmen made a killing from oil-fired private power-plant construction and operation while the CEB, grossly unfairly, carried the flak? Something reminiscent is possible if corrupt politicos and greedy renewable energy (RE) investors act in consort. Today RE investors demand that they be paid at a rate corresponding to avoided-cost. Since one unit of RE electricity can displace one unit of fossil-fuel electricity they demand to be paid the avoided cost, which is the cost of the most expensive unit then on grid. But what if you play the following game: First jack up the price of fossil energy, then enact the drama of the brave saviour lopping off a bit at the top? It could be the game of unscrupulous politicians and RE investors to jack up the price of ‘going-to-be-avoided’ electricity first and after that play the drama of avoided-cost. I don’t need to explain; you can work out what the cynic is saying. And let’s not forget that corrupt politicos and market players impede, not assist, ecological goodness.

Technical Note

If 0.66 GW (660MW) were to run flat out, non-stop, every hour of the year the electrical energy output will be 0.66x24x365 = 5,782 GWh. Since plant cannot run without maintenance and since full output is not maintained all the time the actual plant-factor is, say, 70%. The output is then reduced to 5782×0.7 = 4,047 GWh. If the efficiency of generation is 40%, then the primary-source energy need at the input is 4047/0.4 = 10,118 GWh-equivalent of LNG energy. Now 1 GWh is the same as 3412×106 Btu (British thermal unit). Therefore the input LNG energy that is needed for both power-stations is 10,118 x 3412×106.which works out at 34.5 million-million-Btu per year, or dividing by 365 we get an average of 94,520 million-Btu per day (44,420 for Yugadhanavi and 50,100 for Sobadhanavi). Someone younger than age-80 kindly check these sums.

However the New Fortress Website declares: “New Fortress will initially provide the equivalent of an estimated 1.2 million gallons of LNG (~35,000 MMBtu) per day to GOSL, with the expectation of significant growth as new power-plant become operational.” There seems to be a cockup in NFE’s numbers, or maybe it’s meant to obfuscate Ministers and Administrators.

[MM stands for Metric-Million. The initial “Metric” is redundant and will be thrown out of the window in self-respecting scientific discourse. So MM simply stands for million].

බලශක්ති සුරක්ෂිතතාවය සහ ජාතික සම්පත්

“???? ???????? ???????? ???? ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ??????????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????????????? ?? ??????????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????????? ….” (Nuremberg Trials) – ???????? ?????? ????????

??.?. ?????? ???????????, ????? ?????? ???.???.??.????????????, ????? ??????????????? ???.???.??????, ????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????, ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????, ????? ??????? ??????? ????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????????? 9 ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? – 2021-09-30 ???????? ??????? ??????? ??????….

???????

𝐂𝐄𝐁 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐟 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐭. 𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥

– ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????? ??$ ????? ???? ? ????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?????

– ???? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ????

– ???? ????. ??????? ??? ????????? ?? ??? ????

– ????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ????? ??? ? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ??

By Nishel Fernando (Daily Mirror)

Sri Lanka stands to lose up to US$ 400 million over the next five-year period if the government decides to move ahead with the unsolicited proposal submitted by the US-based New Fortress Energy (NFE), allowing them to setup the country’s LNG infrastructure and procure LNG from them for the country’s power sector, the Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) cautioned this week.

Following an unsolicited proposal directly sent to the Ministry of Finance, the government signed a Framework Agreement (FA) with NFE on July 7, 2021.

The key features of the unsolicited proposal include the purchase 40 percent shares of West Coast Power Private Limited (WCPL) for US$ 250 million, execution of the LNG terminal project, which includes a floating storage regasification unit (FSRU), a mooring system and the pipelines as well as supply of LNG to WCPL, Sobadhanavi Limited (SBL) and other plants.

Further, the CEBEU claimed that the proposal also includes giving away exclusive rights of supplying LNG to Sri Lanka’s electricity generation to NFE with commitment to purchase LNG from the firm under very strict conditions, which would be favourable to them.

CEBEU stated that the Cabinet of Ministers has already approved a resolution to enter into a gas supply term sheet and share sale & purchase agreement of WCPL and a gas supply agreement for SBL. Hence, it fears that the government has already entered into some of these agreements. 

“Though in general, take-or-pay (TOP) clauses are typically not absolute and may include flexibility mechanisms for the buyer to adjust the contracted volumes, huge amount of TOP gas volumes   commitments of the buyers have been included in the NFE offer. The purchaser needs to pay the LNG supplier the cost of TOP gas volumes whether or not the purchaser uses the particular gas volumes,” CEBEU stated. 

The trade union warned that the CEB and the government could incur an additional US$ 400 million as a result of these clauses including the additional undue gain from LNG pricing formula, which is extremely high when compared to international competitive prices.

It estimated that the transaction cost under the NFE’s LNG supply contract could be in the range of US$ 3 billion for 5 years and could go up to US$ 6 billion for 10 years.

“The offered pricing formulas for LNG supply are very much disadvantageous to Sri Lanka. NFE could make enormous profits from this contract. It is like the infamous hedging deal of petroleum fuel supply, which caused  a loss of millions of dollars to the country. If this NFE proposal is implemented, Sri Lanka will not have the opportunity to gain the advantages of price reductions of LNG in future. Further, Sri Lanka will be deprived of benefiting to procure LNG on government to government (G to G) contracts from friendly Middle Eastern countries,” it elaborated. 

Further, under the NFE contract for terminal facility, CEB is also required to pay a minimum of US$ 253 million for 5 years for the FSRU separately as the capacity charge in addition to LNG payment, which is in contrast to the previous unsolicited proposal made by a South Korean firm under the Swiss Challenge basis, where the payment to FSRU was free-of-charge.

Hence, CEBEU claimed that the unsolicited proposal which came in disguise at US$ 250 million for 40 percent of WCPL, in fact aims to secure multi-billion LNG supply contracts without competition and with exclusive rights of supplying LNG to the whole country with undefined extended duration beyond 5 years, creating a monopoly in LNG supply and risking the country’s national security and energy security. 

The Union also raised concerns on the laws governing these contracts. 

“The governing law of the contracts is the Law of England and Wales where Sri Lanka will be in a very  much disadvantageous and powerless position,” it stated. 

Moreover, the CEBEU also charged that the purchase consideration of US$ 250 million for 40 percent stake in WCPL by NFE is less than the valuation of the Chief Government Valuer.

It also cautioned that implementation of NFE’s unsolicited contracts would mark the end of competitive bidding process for LNG supply, the FSRU and pipelines as there are no other requirements than a single terminal facility and single LNG supply contract for the country at the moment. 

In addition, it pointed out that the country’s power sector won’t be able to benefit from exploration of natural gas in Mannar basin, if these unsolicited contracts are implemented. 

“The Ministry of Energy is working fast on the exploration of natural gas in Mannar basin. This will be of no use locally as entire LNG supply of the country will be supplied through a NFE contract,” it said.

New Fortress Energy (NFE) Unsolicited Proposal; Threat to Energy Security and Enormous Loss to the Country

National Energy Policy

  • The Sri Lanka government has gazetted the National Energy Policy and Strategies of Sri Lanka in August 2019. The primary objective of the national energy policy is to ensure energy security through the supplies of reliable, cost effective and competitively priced energy services from diverse sources to support the social equitable development of Sri Lanka. National energy policy is founded mainly focusing on several aspects such as assuring energy security through continuity, adequacy and reliability, providing energy services at the optimum cost to the national economy, enhancing self-reliance, strengthening good governance in the energy sector among several others.    
  • The national energy policy identifies the liquefied natural gas (LNG) as the next fossil fuel option for the country to broaden diversity.
  • The national energy policy clearly states that considering the impact to the national energy security, operation of the first LNG terminal and LNG procurement shall be kept under state control.
  • National energy policy further establishes that procurement of plant, equipment, crude oil and other fuels as well as power purchase agreements and similar concessions, will be made through a streamlined competitive bidding scheme ensuring transparency and accountability.        

CEB’s Initiatives for the Deployment of LNG for Electricity Generation in Sri Lanka

  • In line with the national energy policy and the general policy guidelines on the electricity industry, CEB has already taken initiatives to deploy LNG for electricity generation in Sri Lanka.  
  • CEB has already developed a comprehensive road map for the deployment of LNG for Sri Lanka electricity generation through a detailed feasibility study funded by ADB. 
  • The intention was to deploy LNG for the Colombo based power plants initially with the actual LNG requirement determined carefully in accordance with CEB’s generation plan as well as forecasted dispatch scenario.
  • The tenders were separated for the procurement of LNG terminal, pipeline and LNG supply through competitive bidding process to secure the optimum economic benefits to the country while ensuring the transparency and accountability. 
  • International Competitive Tenders were called by CEB to procure LNG terminal (FSRU, mooring facility and other infrastructure) and by CPC to construct the pipe line network and the bids received are currently under evaluation.
  • Bid documents to procure LNG through competitive bidding process are being prepared.

Page 2 of 6 New Fortress Energy’s Proposal

  • New Fortress Energy (NFE), a USA based company has submitted an unsolicited proposal directly to the Ministry of Finance which has a huge direct impact to the LNG deployment in Sri Lanka.
  • This NFE’s unsolicited proposal was submitted disturbing the formal procurement process to procure LNG, terminal facility and pipelines to Sri Lanka through competitive bidding process where bids on terminal facility and pipelines are now in the final stage of evaluation.
  • The salient features of NFE’s unsolicited proposal are as follows,
  1. To purchase 40% of shares of West Coast Power Private Limited (WCPL) at a purchase consideration of USD 250 million.
  2. To execute LNG terminal project which includes Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU), Mooring system and the Pipelines.
  3. Supply of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to WCPL, Sobadhanavi Limited (SBL) and other plants which will come in Kerawalapitiya and with higher possibility the CEB plants at Kelanitissa as well.  
  4. Inclusion of very high Take or Pay (TOP) gas volumes than the actual minimum requirement of the country with strict conditions that NFE should be paid irrespective of whether the contracted volumes are consumed or not. 
  5. Contract term initially for 5 years with almost definite compelled further extensions.
  6. Exclusive rights of suppling LNG to Sri Lanka electricity generation.
  7. NFE being granted all tax exemptions/benefits/investment incentives available under Sri Lankan law.
  8. Any taxes/charges which are not exempted will be a pass-through cost.
  9. Governing law of the contracts is Laws of England and Wales.
  • The Framework Agreement (FA) has already been signed between the GOSL and NFE on 07.07.2021.
  • Recently, Cabinet has given approval to enter into the Gas Supply Term Sheet, Share Sale & Purchase Agreement (SSPA) of WCPL, Gas Supply Agreements with WCPL and SBL and subsequently media reports reveal that some of these agreements have already been signed.

Threat to the National Energy Security & Enormous Loss to the Country if NFE’s Unsolicited Proposal is implemented

  • The unsolicited proposal of NFE contradicts the provisions of the procurement policies and principles, National Energy Policy as well as Sri Lanka Electricity Act, where competitive bidding process should be adopted to procure electricity as well as fuels and also to keep the first LNG terminal and LNG supply under the state control. 
  • Exclusive rights of supplying LNG to Sri Lanka will be tied up with a USA company for 5 years initially with definite compelled extensions forever which is a great threat to national energy security. The Colombo based existing and future power plants can be controlled by a USA company through the LNG supply which will greatly hamper the country’s electricity supply availability and reliability. Supply of LNG under this contract may not be limited to electricity sector but could also be extended to other sectors such as transport and domestic usage in the years to come which will give a huge controlling power to a foreign company.  
  • The contracts of LNG terminal, pipelines and LNG supply bundled together in a single unsolicited contract and handed over to a foreign company which is a severe threat to the national security as well as energy security and Sri Lanka will be in their custody forever.
  • Majority of the countries in the world, the contracts of LNG supply and infrastructure development are not bundled together instead execute as separate tenders due to the concerns of national security, energy security and to harness the maximum benefit of market competitiveness. 
  • Acquiring shares of WCPL and also SBL which is an absolute possibility as learnt, a USA based company will have the control over the electricity supply in the country.
  • The transaction cost under the NFE’s LNG supply contract could be in the range of USD 3000 million for 5 years and could go up to USD 6000 million for 10 years, given the fact that the country will be forced to buy LNG from NFE for the plants in Kelanitissa premises as well since there is no other alternative option. It is a huge crime meted out to the country if such a massive contract which could easily be the biggest contract of the country, is obtained through an unsolicited proposal without following due competitive bidding process.
  • The offered pricing formulas for LNG supply are very much disadvantages to Sri Lanka. NFE could make enormous profits from this contract. It is like the infamous hedging deal of petroleum fuel supply which caused millions of dollar loss to the country. If this NFE proposal is implemented, GOSL will not have the opportunity to gain the advantages of price reductions of LNG in future. Further, GOSL will be deprived of benefitting to procure LNG on Government to Government (G to G) contracts from friendly middle east countries.  
  • Though in general, Take or Pay (TOP) clauses are typically not absolute and may include flexibility mechanisms for the buyer to adjust the contracted volumes, huge amount of TOP gas volumes with firm commitments of the buyers have been included in the NFE offer. The purchaser needs to pay the LNG supplier the cost of TOP gas volumes whether or not the purchaser uses the particular gas volumes. Hence, TOP gas volumes needs to be very carefully determined to the minimum value considering the plant factor, availability, dispatch scenario and availability of other low-cost energy sources like hydro, coal, wind and solar.
  • However, the TOP volumes included in the NFE’s LNG supply contract are extremely high. It can cause a huge additional financial burden on CEB and GOSL up to USD 400 million for 5 years including the additional undue gain from LNG pricing formula which is extremely high comparing to international competitive prices.
  • With the government’s simultaneous policy decision of 70% Renewable Energy integration for electricity generation, the usage of LNG could be even less and Take or Pay commitment of LNG will burden the country even more while benefitting NFE massively.
  • What is more pathetic and beyond thinkable is that when it is unable to use the TOP LNG volume in a month, the purchaser has to pay the cost for TOP volume for that month and then subsequently has to pay again for the next month’s actual usage of the same LNG which is stored in seller’s facility. It is like selling the same LNG quantity twice. This is the extent of losing by the country if LNG supply contracts are signed for higher TOP volumes.
  • Higher TOP contracts will also influence the merit order dispatching of power plants in the country and can lead to corruption practices.
  • Under the NFE contract for terminal facility, CEB should pay a minimum of USD 253 million for 5 years for FSRU separately as the capacity charge in addition to LNG payment. However, with the previous unsolicited Korean offer under the Swiss Challenge basis, the FSRU was offered free of charge.
  • In the Cabinet paper dated 06.09.2021 submitted by the Hon. Minister of Finance with regard to the NFE’s unsolicited proposal, the capacity charge on the CEB executed tender for FSRU was compared to indicate that NFE’s unsolicited proposal is more economical than offers received through CEB’s competitive bidding process. This is a big lie and misrepresentation of real facts to misguide the Cabinet and the general public. NFE is granted all tax exemptions/benefits/investment incentives while bidders through CEB’s competitive bidding process are subjected to payment of 24% of corporate tax and personal income taxes. In addition, under the tender conditions, the pipeline system having 40 years of lifetime and mooring facility having 25 years of lifetime will be transferred to CPC and CEB respectively free of charge at the end of 10th year of the contract. Costs of these infrastructures contribute significantly to the tariff offered by bidders. Further, the tariff of the tender is inclusive of pipeline from FSRU to Kelanitissa power plant premises which is the most expensive and difficult part of the pipeline system. Hence, tendered prices can not be compared with NFE offered prices which is merely based on temporary infrastructures with limited scope.      
  • Further, NFE’s capacity charge of USD 1.45 per MMBtu for FSRU, is just a cover up figure based on a high dispatch scenario whereas the actual dispatch would be much less and the actual capacity charge of NFE could exceed USD 5.50 per MMBtu.
  • It is clear that real dominating factors with respect to financial feasibility are intentionally hidden in the submitted Cabinet paper. The cost of terminal facility and the pipelines is a minute figure of around USD 200 million when compared to the LNG supply contract of around USD 6000 million for 10 years.  Nearly 95% of the total contract sum accounts for the LNG supply contract. Hence, it is the LNG supply contract which matters most for economic feasibility and not the terminal facility as misrepresented through the Cabinet paper. NFE has sensible enough to include all their undue profits in the LNG supply contract while misguiding the GOSL on terminal facility contract benefitted through undue access for the information of bids submitted through CEB’s competitive tender process. 
  • FSRU agreements are extremely complex in nature. Off hire, warranty compensation, operations during turbulent oceanic conditions, commitment to availability of gas during May to September should be covered and none of these things have been discussed.
  • The purchase consideration of USD 250 million for 40% stake in WCPL by NFE is said to be much less than the valuation of Chief Government valuer.   
  • NFE has determined a minimum plant factor of 70% for WCPL which is an extra cost to CEB while more profitable for NFE on return on shareholder investment as well as huge TOP LNG volumes.
  • Changes intended to bring on heat rates during the impending amendments to the existing Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) of WCPL will bring enormous cost to CEB.
  • As per the existing PPA of WCPL, coming years from 2022 onwards will be more profitable for shareholders as repayment of loan has almost been completed and hence NFE will be immensely benefitted.  
  • All existing shareholders of WCPL (Treasury-50%, EPF-27%, LECO-18%, LTL-5%) are local entities and return on equity is paid in LKR. However, when NFE becomes a shareholder, dividends on their investment will have to be paid in USD, a new avenue for forex outflow.     
  • What another regretful fact for the country is that when the dividend payments are compelled to made in USD to NFE during the favorable years to come, the so-called incoming investment of USD 250 million through share purchasing will be wiped off within few years.
  • Under the NFE’s unsolicited LNG supply contract and the amendments to the existing PPA together with actual plant factor, the cost of electricity unit of WCPL could easily go up to such a level that sometimes it might be cheaper running the power plant on HFO under existing PPA. 
  • The Framework Agreement (FA) signed and what is doing now are two different things. FA is only for WCPL with a USD 9.9 Cents maximum price per kWh of electricity. Now, there is a Cabinet decision to amend the FA and increasing of the electricity unit cost is a definite occurrence.        
  • It is crystal clear that the main aim of NFE is not the mere USD 250 million investment in shares of WCPL but the securing of multi-billion dollar LNG supply contract without a competition and with exclusive rights of supplying LNG to the whole country with undefined extended duration beyond 5 years with massive controlling power on the country’s national security and energy security and with guaranteed exorbitant profits.
  • No official discussions or consultations were held with CEB or Ministry of Power on this unsolicited proposal and the Ministry of Finance single handedly managed the entire process.
  • GOSL is going to sign agreements with NFE and not CEB as usually done hence it will be a strong binding and dispute resolution will be extremely difficult.  
  • The governing law of the contracts is the Law of England and Wales where Sri Lanka will be in a very much disadvantageous and powerless position.
  • In the Cabinet paper dated 06.09.2021, the Minister of Finance has quoted and compared all figures from the financial proposal of the ongoing tender initiated by CEB. This is totally against the NPA procurement guidelines and good governance. This will set a very bad precedence on all types of procurement in the country and severely hamper the credibility, transparency and confidentiality. This will greatly discourage genuine investors coming to our country. This is a gross violation of the clause 3.8.2 of the national energy policy as well.     
  • NFE has taken all information from CEB floated tender for FSRU to formulate their offer and bundled with LNG supply also. All studies carried out by CEB for years have been obtained by NFE at no cost and submitted an unsolicited proposal.
  • Implementation of NFE unsolicited contracts is the end of competitive bidding process for LNG supply, FSRU and pipelines as there are no other requirements than a single terminal facility and single LNG supply contract to Sri Lanka at the moment.
  • The Ministry of Energy is working fast on exploration of natural gas in Mannar basin. This will be of no use locally as entire LNG supply of the country will be supplied through NFE contract.

රටේ බලශක්ති ආරක්‍ෂාවට තර්ජිත, New Fortress Energy (NFE) සමාගම ගෙනෙන Unsolicited ආකාරයේ යෝජනා රටට විශාල පාඩුවක්

????? ??????? ????????????

??????, ?????????? ??? ?? ??????????; ??????? ????????????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????, ????? ???????? ???????? ????? ??????? ???? ??????, ??????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ?????, ??????? ????????? ??? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ‘????? ??????? ????????????’ ????? ???? ??? ?????? 2019 ??????? ?? ‘????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???????????? ?? ???? ?????’ ????? ??? ?? ??? ??? ????? ???????? ????? ?????????, ??????? ?? ??????? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ???? ?????? ????????? ????? ???? ??? ??????? ????????????? ????? ???????.

?? ??? ???????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?? ???? (Country to broaden diversity) ????? ????? ??????? ??? (Fossil Fuel Option) ??????? ?? ????????? ????? (Liquefied Natural Gas – LNG) ???? ????? ??????? ????????????? ????????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ????????? ??? ?? ????? ???? ???? LNG ????????? ??????????????? ?? LNG ???????????? (Operation & Procurement) ?????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????????? ????? ?? ??.

??????????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ???????? ?????? ???????, ?????, ??????? ?? ??????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ? ?? ???? ??? ??????????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ????????????? ???????? ???????? ?? ??.

LNG ???????? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ????????

????? ??????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ?????????????? ???????, ????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? LNG ??????? ?? ?? ????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??.

  1. ??????? ??????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ???????????? ??????? ???????????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???? ?? ??.
  • ???????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ??????????? ???? ????? ?? ????? LNG ????????????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? ??.
  • ??????????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ???????? ?????? ????????? ??? ??? ???? LNG ????????, ?? ?????? ?? LNG ?????? ??????????? ??????? ???? ??? ???.
  • LNG Terminal (FSRU, Mooring Facility & other Infrastructure) ????? ????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? ??????? ????.
  • ??????? ???? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? LNG ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ????.

New Fortress Energy (NFE) ??????? ?????

?????? ?????? ???? NFE ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? LNG ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ????????????? ????????? ??.

NFE ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??.

  1. ????? ?????? 250 ? West Coast Power Private Limited (WCPL) ????? 40% ?? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????.
  2. FSRU, Mooring System ?? ?? ??????? ???? LNG ??????? ??????????? ?????.
  3. ?????????? ?????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??? WCPL, Sobadhanavi Limited (SBL) ?????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? LNG ??????  
  4. ???????? ????? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??? 5 ?? ???? ??????????? ????.
  5. ?????? ???????? ???? ?????? LNG ??????? ??? ??????.
  6. ????? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????/?????????/????? ???? ????? NFE ??? ??? ???.
  7. ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ????????? ???.

NFE ?????? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ????? ?? ??????????? ????? ??? ????? ???????

  • ??????????? ???????????, ????? ??????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ??? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ????????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????????? NFE ????????.
  • ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ??? ??? 5 ?? ???? ???? ????? ????? ???????????? ???? ??????? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ??? ???? ? ???????? ?? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ????? ????????. ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????????????? ???? ???????? ?????? ???????? ????? ???? ???? NFE ????? ???????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ??.
  • ???????? ????????, ?? ????? ?? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ????? ??? ???? ?????, ?????????????? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ????? ???????? ???? ???????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??????? ??????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ???????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ??.
  • ??? ???? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ????(LNG) ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ???????? ????? ????????? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ???? ???? ????.
  • WCPL ?? SGL ?? ????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????? ????? ??? ??.
  • NFE ????? ???? ????????? ???????? ????(LNG) ??????? ?????????????? ??? ???? ???? ????????? ????? ?????? 3000?? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ????????? ????? ?????? 6000?? ????? ??????? ???. ???? ??? ??????? ???? ?? ??????? ??????????????? ??????? ?????? ??? ???????? ???????????????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????????? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????? ????? ????????.
  • ?????? ????????? ???????? ????(LNG) ??????? ???? ??????? ????? ????? ????????? ???? ?????? ????????? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ??. ??? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ????? ??????? ?????????????.
  • NFE ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ????????? LNG ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ????????? ?????? ??? ??. ??? ????? ??????  ?????????? ????????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???????? ???? LNG ????? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??.
  • ???????????? TOP (Take or Pay) ??????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? LNG ???????? ????????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?? ?????? ???????? ????????????? ??? ??????. ??????? ????? ????? ??????? LNG ??????????? TOP ??????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????? ?????. ? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? TOP LNG ?????? ????? ????? ?????????????? ?????? ?????. ??? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? (Plant Factor), ?????? ?????? ????? ???????(Plant Availability), ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? (Dispatch Scenario) ?? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ?? ??, ??? ?????, ????, ????? ????????? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?????.

????? ??? ??????? ????? NFE ??????  LNG ??????? ??????????????? ????? ?? TOP-LNG ??????? ??? ??? ????. ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ??????????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? 500 ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??. ???? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? NFE ????? ?? ???????? ??? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ???? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ????? ????????? ???? ?????? ????? ??.

?? ????? ???? ??????? ???????????? ?? 2030 ????? ??? ??????? ????????? 70%?? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ???? ????????? LNG ????????? ??? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ???? ?????? ???????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ??? ????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? NFE ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??.

??? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ???????? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? LNG  ??????   ??? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? LNG ?????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????. ? ???? ????? ??????????? ???????? ???? ?? ??? LNG ??? ??????? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????? ??????? ??. ??? ???????? ????? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????????????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ???.

  • ?????? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????????????? ??????? ?? ??? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? LNG ?????? ????? ???????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??????????? ????.
  • NFE ?????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ??????????????? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ????????? ????? ????? (Floating Storage Regasification Unit –FSRU)  ???? ??? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? 253? ?????? ?????? ???????(Capacity Charge) ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ??????? TOP-LNG ???????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????.
  • 2021.09.06 ??????? ??? ????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ????????? ???????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? NFE ?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????????? ????? ????. ??? ???? NFE ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ??????????? FSRU ???? ?? ?????? ???????(Capacity Charge) ???? ???????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ??? ????????  ?? ??? ??? ????? ????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??? ????? ?? ??. ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ????????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ?????. ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ???, ??????? ?? ????? ????????? ???? ????????? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ???????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ??????? ???????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???. ????? ??? ??????? ???? ??????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????(Capacity Charge) ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????.

??? NFE ?????? ?????? ???????(Capacity Charge) ?? FSRU ???????? ???????? ???? ??? (MMBTU – Metric Million British Thermal Unit) ????????? ???? ?? ????????? ????? 1.45? ???? LNG ?????? ?????? ????????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????. ?????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ?? ??????? LNG ?????? ????????? ???????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??? FSRU ???? ???(MMBTU -Metric Million British Thermal Unit) ????????? ???? ????????? ????? 5.50? ??????? ???.

  • ??? ????? ?? ??????? ????????? ????? ?????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????????. ???????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???????? ?? ????? (?.?? ?????? 200?? ???) LNG ??????? ?????????????? (??? 10?? ???? ?.?? ?????? 6000?? ???) ?? ???? ???????? ???????? ???? ??????. ????? ??????????????? ???????? 95%?? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? LNG ?????? ?????? ?????.
  • ??? ??? ?? LNG ????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ???? ???????? ???? LNG ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ??????????. ?? ???? ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?????????? ????? ??? ?? ?????????. NFE ????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???????? ??? ??????? ???????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? LNG ??????? ?????????????? ????? ???????????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ??. ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ?? ??????? ??? ???? ??????? LNG ??????? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??????????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??.
  • FSRU ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ????????? ???. ?????? ???? ???? ??????, ?????? ????????????, ?????? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????, ???? ??? ??????????? ????? ???? ??? ?????? LNG ????? ??????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???????? ??? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ????????? ???????? ??? ????? ???????? ???????? ?? ?????.
  • West Coast Plant Limited (WCPL) ???????? ????? 40%?? ????? ????? ???? ????????? ????? ?????? 250?? ??????? NFE ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ??????????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ??? ???? ????.
  • ?????? NFE ????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????(Plant Factor) 70% ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ??.??????? ???? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???????? ??? LNG ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ????????? ????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??. ??? ??? ???? ???  ?????? ??????? (Plant Factor) ????? ??? LNG ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? TOP-LNG ???????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??????? ????????? ?????.
  • ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? West Coast Plant Limited(WCPL) ??????? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ?? ???? ??????? ??????? ???? ??????? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ???.
  • ????????? ??????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???? 2022 ?????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????????? ?? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ??? ??? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??.
  • West Coast Plant Limited (WCPL) ???????? ??????? ??????????? (??? ?????????? – 50%, ???????? ?????? – 27%, ???? ?????? ???????? ????? (LECO) – 18%, ???? ?????????????? ????? (LTL) – 5%) ???????? ???????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ??????????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??????? ?????. ????? ??? ?????? ????? ????? 40%?? ????????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????????? ?? ?????? ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ??.
  • ???? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ????????? ????????????? ????????? ????? ?????? 250? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????.
  • ?? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? TOP-LNG ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? West Coast Plant Limited(WCPL) ???????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????(Plant Factor)? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ??????? ??.30.00?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??. ? ???????? ???????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????????? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ???? ?????.
  • ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ??????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ????? ??. ?? ??????????? ????? ??? ???? ????????? ????? WCPL ???????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?? 9.9?? (??. 19.80?? ???) ??????? ??? ?? ??? ??????? ?? ?????????? ???? ?? ??? ??????? 30.00?? ????? ???? ?? ??.
  • ??? ????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ?????? WCPL ???????? ????? 40%?? ????????? ????? ?????? 250?? ?? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? LNG ??????? ??????? ?? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????? ???????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ?????????. ?? ???????? ???????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?? ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ??.
  • ?? ????? ??? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ??????????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??.
  • ??????? ???????? ?????? ???? LNG ????? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????????? ????? ??? ???????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ??? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ??.
  • ??? NFE ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? LNG ?????? ???? ????? ????????? ??????  FSRU ?? ?? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ????? LNG ?????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??? ?? ??????????? ?????? ???? ????????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??.
  • ????????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ????????? ??? LNG ?????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ?? ??? ??? ????????? ????? ??? ????? ???????? ??? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ??? ????????? LNG ?????? ???? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??.

LNG ගනුදෙනුව වහා අත් හිටුවන්න…!!!

???????? ?????? ????????? ???????? 40 % ??? ????? ?????? – ????? ???????? ?????

?? ?????? News1st ????? ??????? ??????? ??????. (https://youtu.be/UPvmtQ34oAQ?t=829)

”?? ??? ???? ????, ?????? ????? ??? ?? 5% ??. 90% ?? 95% ?? ???????? ??? ???? ???? ?????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? LNG ??? ?? ?????? ??????????????? ???? ???? ??????? ?? ????????. ??? ???????? ????? ??????”

???? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ???????????? ????? ???? ??????? ??????? 10 ?? 15 ?? ??? ????? ???? ??? ?????, ?????????? ?????????? ????? ??? ?.

”? ???? ???? ? ?????? ???????????? ?? ????? ??????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??????? 10 ?? 15 ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?????. ??? ??????? ?????????????? ???????. ?? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ?? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?????”

?? ? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ????? ??? ?????????? ?? ???????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ????, ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ????.

Sri Lanka could lose Billions through unsolicited New-Fortress Energy Deal

Sri Lanka stands to lose hundreds of millions of dollars through a back-door liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal with a US firm which could be worth up to 6.0 billion US dollars but is coming in as the sale of share of a power plant, engineers of the state power utility have warned.

Energy security would also be undermined as the national grid would be dependent on a single company for the supply of LNG to the entire country and will also block state-run Ceylon Electricity Board from using cheapest energy source based on market prices, the CEB Engineers Union has said.

It is not clear how the unsolicited deal was suddenly struck without open tender for either the sale of a 40 percent Treasury stake in a power plant, LNG procurement for at least five years, or to operate floating liquefied natural gas terminal which is expected to charge fees from the state-run Ceylon Electricity Board.-EconomyNext

Read The Story: https://economynext.com/sri-lankas-could-lose-billions…/